The Validity and Reliability of Provocation Testsin the Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
 
Yazarlar (3)
Doç. Dr. Hilal Telli Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Serkan Telli Kütahya Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Murat TOPAL Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı PAIN PHYSICIAN (Q2)
Dergi ISSN 1533-3159 Dergi Bilgileri (2018)
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 07-2018
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 21 / 4 / – DOI
Makale Linki https://www.painphysicianjournal.com/current/pdf?article=NTMxNQ==&journal=112
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
Özet
Background: Although sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is generally regarded as a source of lumbar pain, its anatomical position and the absence of a diagnostic ‘gold standard’lead to difficulties at examination and differential diagnosis. However, since sacroiliac (SI) joint blocks only provide information about pathologies of joint origin and since SIJD developing secondary to pathologies in structures around the joint can be missed. Provocation and palpation tests also need to be used in diagnosis.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of clinical examination and provocation tests used in the diagnosis of SIJD.Study Design: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.Setting: Outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic.Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients presenting with lumbar and/or leg pain and diagnosed with SIJD through clinical evaluation were included in the study. Range of lumbar joint movement, pain location and specific tests used in the diagnosis of SIJD were evaluated. Positivity in 3 out of 6 provocation tests was adopted as the criterion.Results: 75.2% of patients were female and 24.8% were male. Mean age was 46.41±10.45 years. A higher level of females was determined in ender distribution. SIJD was determined on the right in 52.6% of patients and on the left in 47.4%. When SI joint provocation tests were analyzed individually, the highest positivity, in 91.4% patients diagnosed with SIJD, was in the FABER test. The lowest positivity, in 56.4% of patients, was determined in the Ganslen test. The same patients were assessed by the same clinician at 2 different times. In …
Anahtar Kelimeler
Dysfunction | lumbar | sacroiliac joint | provocation test | sacroiliac joint pain | pain pattern Pain
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science 50
Google Scholar 109

Paylaş