img
Mapping the patchy legislative landscape of non-native tree species in Europe    
Yazarlar
Elisabeth Pötzelsberger
Katharina Lapin
Giuseppe Brundu
Tim Adriaens
Vlatko Andonovski
Sinisa Andraev
Jean Charles Bastien
Robert Brus
Milic Curovic
Zeljka Curovic
Branislav Cvjetkovi
Martina Dodan
Juan M Domingo Santos
Anna Gazda
Jean Marc Henin
Cornelia Hernea
Bo Karlsson
Ljiljana Keca
Srdan Keren
Zsolt Keserü
Thomai Konstantara
Johan Kroon
Nicola La Porta
Vasyl Lavnyy
Dagnija Lazdina
Aljona Lukjanova
Tiit Maaten
Palle Madsen
Dejan Mandjukovski
Francisco J Marn Pageo
Vitas Marozas
Antonin Martinik
William L Mason
Frits Mohren
Maria Cristina Monteverdi
Charalambos Neophytou
Pat Neville
Valeriu Norocel Nicolescu
Per Holm Nygaard
Christophe Orazio
Taras Parpan
Sanja Peric
Krasimira Petkova
Emil Borissov Popov
Mick Power
Karoly Redei
Matti Rousi
Joaquim S Silva
Prof. Dr. Ahmet SIVACIOĞLU
Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Michalis Socratous
Lina Straigyt
Josef Urban
Kris Vandekerkhove
Radosaw Wasik
Marjana Westergren
Thomas Wohlgemuth
Ylioja Tiina
Hubert Hasenauer
Özet
Europe has a history rich in examples of successful and problematic introductions of trees with a native origin outside of Europe (non-native trees, NNT). Many international legal frameworks such as treaties and conventions and also the European Union have responded to the global concern about potential negative impacts of NNT that may become invasive in natural ecosystems. It is, however, national and regional legislation in particular that affects current and future management decisions in the forest sector and shapes the landscapes of Europe. We identified all relevant legal instruments regulating NNT, the different legal approaches and the regulatory intensity in 40 European countries (no microstates). Information on hard and effective soft law instruments were collected by means of a targeted questionnaire and consultation of international and national legislation information systems and databases. In total, 335 relevant legal instruments were in place in June/July 2019 to regulate the use of NNT in the investigated 116 geopolitical legal units (countries as well as sub-national regions with their own legislation). Countries and regions were empirically categorized according to ad hocdefined legislation indicators. These indicators pay respect to the general bans on the introduction of non-native species, the generally allowed and prohibited NNT, approval mechanisms and specific areas or cases where NNT are restricted or prohibited. Our study revealed a very diverse landscape of legal frameworks across Europe, with a large variety of approaches to regulating NNT being pursued and the intensity of restriction ranging from very few restrictions on species choice and plantation surface area to the complete banning of NNT from forests. The main conclusion is that there is a clear need for more co-ordinated, science-based policies both at the local and international levels to enhance the advantages of NNT and mitigate potential negative effects.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Makale Türü Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayımlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
Dergi ISSN 0015-752X
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 01-2020
Cilt No 93
Sayı 4
Sayfalar 567 / 586
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
WoS 16
SCOPUS 21

Paylaş