Yazarlar |
Cüneyt Özden
Türkiye |
Yalçın Kızılkan
Türkiye |
Süleyman Camgöz
Türkiye |
Semih Başkan
Türkiye |
Cevdet Serkan Gökkaya
Türkiye |
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Şahin PAŞALI
Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye |
Özet |
To evaluate the efficacy of caudal regional anesthesia and local anesthesia methods in prostate biopsy applied under transrectal ultrasonography. Matherials and Methods: This prospective study included a total of 160 patients randomly separated into 4 equal groups as intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic local anesthesia (PPLA), combined local anesthesia (IRLA+PPLA), and caudal regional anesthesia (CRA). The patients were evaluated using the pain scores on a visual analog scale. The pain score during anesthesia induction was significantly higher in the CRA group than in the IRLA and IRLA+PPLA groups (p<0.001). The pain score during entry of the probe to the rectum and movement was significantly lower in the CRA group than the IRLA groups (p=0.014). The pain score on penetration of the needle to the prostate and at 30 mins after the biopsy was significantly higher in the IRLA group (p<0.001). At 2 hours after the biopsy, the pain score in the CRA group was significantly lower than IRLA groups (p=0.015). The PPLA alone can be applied more quickly than CRA, causes less pain during the application, and has similar efficacy in reducing pain during and after the prostate biopsy procedure. |
Anahtar Kelimeler |
caudal regional anesthesia | pain | prostate biopsy | prostate cancer | periprostatic local anesthesia |
Makale Türü | Özgün Makale |
Makale Alt Türü | SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayımlanan tam makale |
Dergi Adı | UROLOGY JOURNAL |
Dergi ISSN | 1735-1308 |
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded |
Makale Dili | Türkçe |
Basım Tarihi | 11-2020 |
Cilt No | 17 |
Sayı | 6 |
Sayfalar | 597 / 601 |
Doi Numarası | 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5503 |
Makale Linki | https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/urolj/index.php/uj/article/view/5503/1776 |