Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Özden, Cüneyt; Kızılkan, Yalçın; Camgöz, Süleyman; Başkan, Semih; Gökkaya, Cevdet Serkan; PAŞALI, Şahin

doi:10.22037/uj.v16i7.5503

Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Yazarlar (6)

Cüneyt Özden
Türkiye

Yalçın Kızılkan
Türkiye

Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Süleyman Camgöz Türkiye

Prof. Dr. Semih Başkan Türkiye

Cevdet Serkan Gökkaya
Türkiye

Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Şahin PAŞALI Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye

Makale Türü	Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı	UROLOGY JOURNAL
Dergi ISSN	1735-1308 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler	SCI-Expanded
Makale Dili	Türkçe	Basım Tarihi	11-2020
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa	17 / 6 / 597–601	DOI	10.22037/uj.v16i7.5503
Makale Linki	https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/urolj/index.php/uj/article/view/5503/1776
UAK Araştırma Alanları	Üroloji

Özet

To evaluate the efficacy of caudal regional anesthesia and local anesthesia methods in prostate biopsy applied under transrectal ultrasonography. Matherials and Methods: This prospective study included a total of 160 patients randomly separated into 4 equal groups as intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic local anesthesia (PPLA), combined local anesthesia (IRLA+PPLA), and caudal regional anesthesia (CRA). The patients were evaluated using the pain scores on a visual analog scale. The pain score during anesthesia induction was significantly higher in the CRA group than in the IRLA and IRLA+PPLA groups (p<0.001). The pain score during entry of the probe to the rectum and movement was significantly lower in the CRA group than the IRLA groups (p=0.014). The pain score on penetration of the needle to the prostate and at 30 mins after the biopsy was significantly higher in the IRLA group (p<0.001). At 2 hours after the biopsy, the pain score in the CRA group was significantly lower than IRLA groups (p=0.015). The PPLA alone can be applied more quickly than CRA, causes less pain during the application, and has similar efficacy in reducing pain during and after the prostate biopsy procedure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

caudal regional anesthesia | pain | prostate biopsy | prostate cancer | periprostatic local anesthesia

BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları

Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science	2

Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Dergi Adı	Urology Journal
Yayıncı	Urology and Nephrology Research Centre
Açık Erişim	Hayır
ISSN	1735-1308
E-ISSN	1735-546X
CiteScore	2,3
SJR	0,363
SNIP	0,527

Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Paylaş