The Interconnection Between Workplace Incivility, Religiosity and Employees’ Psychological Well-Being: An Update of the Conservation of Resources Theory
Yazarlar (5)
Ahmad Abualigah Abu Dhabi University, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri
Tamer Koburtay Abu Dhabi University, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri
Jawad Syed Suleman Dawood School Of Business, Pakistan
Doç. Dr. Hasan Evrim ARICI Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Mohammed Aboramadan Doha Institute For Graduate Studies, Katar
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (ESCI dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Journal of Management Spirituality and Religion | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1476-6086 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | Scopus | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 01-2024 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 21 / 1 / 42–62 | DOI | 10.51327/MQXL8668 |
| Makale Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.51327/mqxl8668 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Otel İşletmeciliği
|
||
| Özet |
| Drawing upon the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study contextually examines the relationship between workplace incivility and employees' psychological well- being, and the moderating effect of religiosity on this relationship. Following a quantitative approach, data were collected from 199 employees from different service industries in Jordan and the hypotheses were tested with partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLSSEM) using SmartPLS 3.3.3. The findings show that workplace incivility negatively affects employees' psychological well-being, and intrinsic religiosity buffers this adverse effect. Our study brings to fore the concept of religiosity, an important yet neglected personal resource. The findings extend the notion of COR theory through capturing the linkages between the focal constructs, thus contributing to the literature through demonstrating that intrinsic religiosity, as a … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| COR theory | Jordan | religiosity | well-being | workplace incivility |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Web of Science | 11 |
| Scopus | 14 |
| Google Scholar | 19 |