Comparison of Bone Mineral Density of Dominant and Non-dominant Forearm of Badminton Players
Yazarlar (4)
Doç. Dr. Mustafa Şakir AKGÜL Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Arzu Altunel
Kastamonu Üniversitesi
Prof. Dr. Veli Volkan Gürses Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Bilgehan BAYDİL Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Açık Erişim Özgün Makale (Ulusal alan endekslerinde (TR Dizin, ULAKBİM) yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise
Dergi ISSN 2147-5652
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler TR DİZİN
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 09-2019
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 21 / 2 / 337–340 DOI 10.15314/tsed.587100
Makale Linki https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.15314/tsed.587100
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Egzersiz ve Spor Fizyolojisi
Özet
Research related to arm bone density of badminton players focused mainly on humerus, how much forearm exposed tophysical load is affected by this stress has been studies less. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate mineral density ofdominant and non-dominant forearm bone mineral density of badminton players who have been regularly playing badmintonfor 10 years. 12 male badminton players whose dominant arms were the same voluntarily participated in this study. BoneMineral Density (BMD) of the players was evaluated with Dual X Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Data was evaluated with SPSS23. Controlled research method was used to estimate BMD of the players. Differences between dominant and non-dominantarms were assessed with a non-parametric test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. P value was set at p<0.05. Significant differencewas found between BMD of dominant right ultra-distal part and BMD of non-dominant left ultra-distal part (z:-2,94, sig:0,00)and between BMD of dominant right proximal part and BMD of non-dominant left proximal part (z:-2,09, sig:0,03). There wasno significant difference between dominant proximal 1/3 part and non-dominant proximal 1/3 part (z:1,85, sig:0,06). As a result,long-term badminton training has positive effects on BMD.
Anahtar Kelimeler