Normotensive Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Reports
Yazarlar (2)
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Barış KÖMÜR Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Selçuk Kara
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği, araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri) (SCI, SSCI, AHCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not, editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Seminars in Ophthalmology (Q3) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 0882-0538 Dergi Bilgileri (2013) | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 07-2013 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 29-04-2013 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 28 / 4 / 256–256 | DOI | 10.3109/08820538.2013.771194 |
| Makale Linki | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/08820538.2013.771194 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Göz Hastalıkları
|
||
| Özet |
| We have read the whole article with great interest. We would like to congratulate Rao1 for reporting five eyes of three patients with normotensive pseudoexfoliation (PEX) glaucoma very sincerely. We have a few comments to make on the study and those are as follows:(1) In Table 2, the central corneal thickness (CCT) measured for right eye and left eye was 490 and 480 μ for case 2, and 466 and 472 μ for case 3, respectively. Maximum diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measured for right eye and left eye was 18 and 21 mm Hg for case 2, and 21 and 18 mm Hg for case 3, respectively. In the article method of measuring IOP was not mentioned; we assume measurements was taken by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). It is well known that corneal parameters affect the accuracy of this instrument. 2, 3 Recent publications suggest that measured IOP with GAT must be corrected for CCT, the ratio is 0.95 mmHg–1 … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Web of Science | 2 |
| Scopus | 2 |
| Google Scholar | 2 |