How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?
Yazarlar (2)
Mehmet Ali Koseoglu Metropolitan State University, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
Doç. Dr. Hasan Evrim ARICI Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü |
Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği,
araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri)
(ESCI dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not,
editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale)
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Journal of Scientometric Research | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2321-6654 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 09-2023 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 12 / 3 / 609–620 | DOI | 10.5530/jscires.12.3.059 |
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
|
||
| Özet |
| To offer new insights into relevant concepts, approaches, and theories, a systematic literature review is considered a common phenomenon in today’s management field. But, the domain has still suffered from a lack of advice on how to design content boundaries as a methodological piece of a systematic review. Our study emphasizes this gap and examines the important piece of review studies in greater detail. Specifically, we provide a critical review of review studies published in leading three management journals (i.e., the International Journal of Management Reviews, the Academy of Management Annals, and the Journal of Management) between 2019 and 2022. Drawing on the methodological review, our research provides issues to acknowledge in the most crucial choices for the content boundary. In addition, our review clarifies three main components of the content boundary process: identification of content boundaries, searching for content boundaries, and confirmation of content boundaries. These components could be adopted as benchmark stages in future systematic review studies. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Content boundary | Keyword selection | Management research | Reviewing | Systematic literature review |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Web of Science | 9 |
| Scopus | 9 |