Reflective practice tools in ESL: Two retrospective evaluations
Yazarlar (2)
Zuleyha Unlu
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Erkan KÜLEKÇİ Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Diğer (Teknik, not, yorum, vaka takdimi, editöre mektup, özet, kitap krıtiği, araştırma notu, bilirkişi raporu ve benzeri) (SCOPUS dergilerinde yayınlanan teknik not, editöre mektup, tartışma, vaka takdimi ve özet türünden makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Applied Linguistics Review | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1868-6303 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 03-2020 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 11 / 1 / 109–127 | DOI | 10.1515/applirev-2017-0075 |
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
|
||
| Özet |
| This article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP's being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners' loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Reflective practice criticisms | reflective practice tools | retrospective RP evaluation |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Scopus | 1 |