Antimicrobial activity of endemic Crataegus tanacetifolia Lam Pers and observation of the inhibition effect on bacterial cells
Yazarlar (5)
Doç. Dr. Mehlika Benli Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Nazife Yiǧit Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Prof. Dr. Fatmagül Geven Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Kerim GÜNEY Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Umit Bingöl
Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | Cell Biochemistry and Function | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1099-0844 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SCI-Expanded | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 12-2008 |
| Kabul Tarihi | – | Yayınlanma Tarihi | 22-10-2008 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 26 / 8 / 844–851 | DOI | 10.1002/cbf.1515 |
| Makale Linki | http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/cbf.1515 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Ekoloji
|
||
| Özet |
| Up to now an increasing number of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria have been reported and thus new natural therapeutic agents are needed in order to eradicate these pathogens. Through the discovery of plants such as Crataegus tanacetifolia (Lam.) Pers that have antimicrobial activity, it will be possible to discover new natural drugs serving as chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of nosocomial pathogens and take these antibiotic‐resistant bacteria under control. The objective of the present study was to determine antimicrobial activity and the activity mechanism of C. tanacetifolia plant extract. The leaves of C. tanacetifolia, which is an endemic plant, were extracted using methanol and tested against 10 bacterial and 4 yeast strains by using a drop method. It was observed that the plant extract had antibacterial effects on Bacillus subtilis, Shigella, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes among the … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| antimicrobial activity | endemic plant | plant extract | Crataegus tanacetifolia |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Web of Science | 31 |
| Scopus | 34 |
| Google Scholar | 58 |