Reflective Practice Tools in ESL: Two Retrospective Evaluations
Yazarlar (2)
Züleyha Ünlü Carlık Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Erkan KÜLEKÇİ Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Makale Türü Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale)
Dergi Adı Applied Linguistics Review
Dergi ISSN 1868-6303 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SSCI
Makale Dili İngilizce Basım Tarihi 08-2020
Kabul Tarihi – Yayınlanma Tarihi 03-08-2018
Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa 11 / 1 / 109–127 DOI 10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
UAK Araştırma Alanları
Yabancı Dil Eğitimi
Özet
Abstract
This article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP’s being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners’ loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Reflective practice criticisms | reflective practice tools | retrospective RP evaluation
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Web of Science 1
Scopus 1
Google Scholar 10
Reflective Practice Tools in ESL: Two Retrospective Evaluations

Paylaş

İletişim
  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü, Kuzeykent Kampüsü, Merkez/Kastamonu
  • unis@kastamonu.edu.tr 03662801000
Sosyal Media
Talentsoft Yazılım Talent Yazılım
Tasarım ve Programlama #2025