img
img
Reflective Practice Tools in ESL: Two Retrospective Evaluations     
Yazarlar (2)
Züleyha Ünlü
Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Erkan KÜLEKÇİ Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Erkan KÜLEKÇİ
Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Devamını Göster
Özet
This article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP's being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners' loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Reflective practice criticisms | reflective practice tools | retrospective RP evaluation
Makale Türü Özgün Makale
Makale Alt Türü SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayımlanan tam makale
Dergi Adı Applied Linguistics Review
Dergi ISSN 1868-6303 Wos Dergi Scopus Dergi
Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler SSCI
Makale Dili İngilizce
Basım Tarihi 08-2020
Cilt No 11
Sayı 1
Sayfalar 109 / 127
Doi Numarası 10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
Makale Linki http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Atıf Sayıları
Reflective Practice Tools in ESL: Two Retrospective Evaluations

Paylaş